RivetCoda / engagement
Choose a billing model that fits your practice.
The work is the same: cleaner claims, accountable follow-up, and a clearer path from visit to payment. Choose how you want to invest.
Two clear ways to work together
No mystery math. No enterprise-sized overhead.
of collections
- Fee moves with what your practice collects
- Hands-on claims and denial follow-up
- A fit when monthly volume varies
- No fixed monthly retainer
per month
- Know the monthly investment up front
- Scope shaped around claim volume
- Hands-on follow-up and collections tracking
- A fit for steady, ongoing support
- Start with a free audit
- No PHI required for qualification
- Choose after we understand your volume
Exact scope and fit are confirmed after the audit. The ranges above are transparent starting points, not a promise of work outside the agreed scope.
How the models differ
Both options start with the same practical review. The difference is how the ongoing work fits your budget and claim volume.
| Features | Percentage of collections | Monthly retainer |
|---|---|---|
| The investment | ||
| Billing basis | 4–8% of collections | $800–$2,500 per month |
| Best for | Variable monthly volume | Steady ongoing support |
| What stays consistent | ||
| Claims audit and fit review | Included | Included |
| Denial and payer follow-up | Included | Included |
| Collections visibility | Included | Included |
Start with the numbers
Help us understand your volume before we talk scope.
Share a few practice-level details and we will point you toward the model that makes the most sense. No patient-level information is needed.
Claim-volume pricing qualification
Share your specialty, provider count, and monthly claim volume so RivetCoda can recommend the clearest pricing model without PHI.
Step 1 of 5
Ready to share more detail now?
Request the full practice audit